Claudine Dombrowski is an amazing human being. Her efforts to free her daughter from the cycle of abuse are tireless. An assumption I made when I read the accounts of mothers was that the recognition within the media would have been enough to alert authorities to act and make provisions for the safety of children. Generally public scrutiny does make an impact upon the changes of our laws, but not in her or her daughters situation.
|
As you view these photos keep in mind that the court awarded FULL CUSTODY of their daughter to the “man” who did this to Claudine.
To read Claudine’s history that was submitted to the IACHR, click here
If you want to know some of the many reasons women stay in abusive relationships, click here
AFTER THE BIRTH OF HER DAUGHTER, 1994
AFTER EX-HUSBAND BEAT HER WITH A CROW BAR, 1996
AFTER EX-HUSBAND RAPED AND BATTERED HER, 2000
AFTER EX-HUSBAND HIRED SOMEONE TO ASSAULT HER, 2003
THE “COFFEE TABLE” IN THE FATHER’S HOME IS A CHILD’S COFFIN. MOUNTED ON THE WALL ABOVE THE SOFA IS A GUN.
|
PRESS RELEASE
May 11, 2007
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT:
Irene Weiser
actnow ^t stopfamilyviolence.org
607-539-6856
MOTHERS FILE INTERNATIONAL COMPLAINT AGAINST UNITED STATES
Mother’s day complaint claims United States courts violate human rights of abused women and children.
NEW YORK, On May 11, just before Mother’s Day weekend, ten mothers, one victimized child, now an adult, leading national and state organizations filed a complaint against the United States with the Inter American Commission on Human Rights. The case claims that U.S. courts, by frequently awarding child custody to abusers and child molesters, has failed to protect the life, liberties, security and other human rights of abused mothers and their children.
“For more than 30 years U.S. judges have given custody or unsupervised visitation of children to abusers and molesters putting the children directly at risk,” says Dianne Post, an international attorney who authored the petition. “These horrendous human rights violations have been brought to the attention of family court systems, and state and federal governments, to no avail. We turn now to international courts to protect the rights and safety of US children.”
The complaint details several cases with documented medical evidence of child sexual abuse, yet in each instance the father who was accused of abuse was given full custody of the children. Several of the mothers were jailed by the courts because of their persistent efforts to protect their children from abuse, several were ordered not to speak of the abuse and not to report abuse to authorities. Every mother was denied contact with her child for some period of time though none was ever proven to have harmed them.
“My life was completely shattered apart on that day and my childhood was destroyed,” said Jeff Hoverson, the adult child petitioner, about the day a family court judge ordered sheriff deputies to deliver him into the custody of his abuser. “It was as if I was just kidnapped. I was torn from everything I knew….I was made into a possession rather than a child.” Hoverson endured years of trauma and fear living in his father’s home before escaping and returning to his mother at age 17. He is haunted by years of feeling helpless to prevent his father’s night-time visits to his sisters’ bedrooms.
“The cases in this petition represent the proverbial tip of the iceberg,” says Irene Weiser, executive director of the online organization Stop Family Violence. “We are contacted by an average of three protective mothers each week who have lost custody to fathers accused of child abuse – in many cases with supporting medical evidence. This is a nationwide crisis of enormous proportion.”
“The lives of thousands of children and mothers have been irreparably harmed by family courts across our nation,” says Joyanna Silberg, Ph.D., executive vice-president of The Leadership Council on Child Abuse and Interpersonal Violence, another national organizations supporting the petition. “The years of trauma and psychological abuse because of the courts’ failings result in lasting emotional damage to the children they are supposed to protect.”
Studies of gender bias in the courts, conducted in the 1980’s and 90’s, found disturbing trends of courts minimizing or excusing men’s violence against women, and favoring the abusers. In 1990 the United States Congress passed a resolution recommending the prohibition of giving joint or sole custody to abusers. Seventeen years later, the practice continues unabated. Ten years ago today, leading national organizations were joined by members of Congress in a protest in Washington D.C. to again raise awareness about the problems in family courts. Today, petitioners say, the problem is systemic and widespread in family law courts across the nation.
The petition seeks a finding from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights that the U.S. has violated the Declaration of the Rights and Responsibilities of Man and the Charter of the Organization of American States and a statement of the steps that the U.S. must take to comply with its human rights obligations in regards to battered women and children in child custody cases.
The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights was created in 1959 and is expressly authorized to examine allegations of human rights violations by members of the Organization of American States, which include the United States. It also carries out on-site visits to observe the general human rights situations in all 35 member states of the Organization of American States and to investigate specific allegations of violations of Inter-American human rights treaties. Its charge is to promote the observance and the defense of human rights in the Americas.
Dianne Post, a 1980 graduate of the University of Wisconsin law school, has worked on issues of gender based violence since 1976. In addition to private practice and legal aid, she has taught legal classes and been a consultant working or living in Russia, Cambodia, Hungary and some dozen other countries. She is currently in Vladivostok, Russia.
In addition to The Leadership Council on Child Abuse and Interpersonal Violence, other national organizations supporting the international lawsuit include: National Organization for Women and the NOW Foundation, National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Justice For Children, National Family Court Watch Project, Legal Momentum, Family Violence Prevention Fund, National Alliance to End Sexual Violence, Domestic Violence Report, Sidran Traumatic Stress Institute, and the National Center on Sexual and Domestic Violence. The petition is supported by many state organizations as well.
In December 2005, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a petition against the United States with the Inter American Commission on Human Rights for their failure to protect Jessica Gonzales’ three children from their abusive father, who murdered them. Their petition, the first of its kind, asserted that domestic violence victims have the right to be protected by the state from the violent acts of their abusers.
For additional information contact:
Irene Weiser
Stop Family Violence
actnow ^t stopfamilyviolence.org
607-539-6856
View the petition at http://www.StopFamilyViolence.org/468
Her next appearance is on her as an advocate for victims commenting on poor sentencing:
February 15, 2009 12:00am
A QUICK-THINKING eight-year-old girl saved her entire family seconds before her Marysville home exploded in flames.
Zoe Budden packed bags for each of her three younger siblings and ordered her parents to leave early, preventing certain tragedy.
“We wouldn’t be here if it wasn’t for Zoe,” her proud father Jason said.
“When we saw the smoke, we were all running around trying to grab things, but Zoe was the prepared one. She had already packed bags for each of the kids and loaded them in the car. She was so organised.
“We would have still been in the house, but she insisted that we leave.
“If it wasn’t for Zoe, we wouldn’t have survived. I have no doubt about that. I believe she was led by God on that day.”
Zoe, a grade 3 student at Marysville Primary, was the guiding light for her brother Reuben, 6, and sisters Febe, 4, and Rebeca, 2.
While her mother Renee was still collecting valuables, Zoe had loaded her sibling’s bags into the car.
– batteredmomslosecustody
This Dr. Harry Harlow was not just unsympathetic, but a monster just like the unethical doctors who forcefully remove children from loving mothers by claiming parental alienation to give them to their abusers are. Why do they do this? Because they get paid by the abuser to do this! It’s a fraud on the courts that needs to end!
From the Top Ten Unethical Psychological Experiments
The Well of Despair 1960
Dr. Harry Harlowwas an unsympathetic person, using terms like the rape rack and iron maiden in his experiments. He is most well-known for the experiments he conducted on rhesus monkeys concerning social isolation. Dr. Harlow took infant rhesus monkeys who had already bonded with their mothers and placed them in a stainless steel vertical chamber device alone with no contact in order to sever those bonds. They were kept in the chambers for up to one year. Many of these monkeys came out of the chamber psychotic, and many did not recover. Dr. Harlow concluded that even a happy, normal childhood was no defense against depression, while science writer Deborah Blum called these, common sense results.
Gene Sackett of the University of Washington in Seattle, one of Harlows doctoral students, stated he believes the animal liberation movement in the U.S. was born as a result of Harlows experiments. William Mason, one of Harlows students, said that Harlow kept this going to the point where it was clear to many people that the work was really violating ordinary sensibilities, that anybody with respect for life or people would find this offensive. Its as if he sat down and said, Im only going to be around another ten years. What Id like to do, then, is leave a great big mess behind. If that was his aim, he did a perfect job.
Any doctor removing a child from their mother using the fraudulent theory of parental alienation or other phony psychobabble BS needs to be exposed for the monster they are. They come up with phony rhetoric and say it in a convincing manner, much like they did back in Salem when they accused women of witchcraft.
This Parental Alienation Custody Change Fraud is going to go down in history as one of the most unethical psychological social engineering experiments of all time. The scandal is on the same level as the cover up of sexual abuse by the Catholic Church. It’s time people start to wake up and recognize that these doctors are covering up for all types of domestic abuse against women and children for PROFIT.
If you click on the links regarding Dr. Harry Harlow, you will find out that he received awards from psychological associations. Maybe this will start to get people thinking that there are groups of people doing unethical experiments and they do support each other on their theories and cover up for each other. The APA also published the Rind Study which tried to justify child sexual abuse as being acceptable and not that harmful to children. There is a common thread between all of these sick studies that push quack theories to justify unacceptable behavior. Only with Parental Alienation Theory, the whole idea is to call the victims liars which re-victimizes them. All that is needed to do this is to pay an unethical doctor to testify who will ignore real evidence and substitute in their fraudulent rhetoric.
When people realized the horrible treatment of animals that Harlow inflicted, the result was an animal liberation movement. What needs to happen as a result of these unethical prental alienation scams is for children to have a liberation movement and demand to have rights to be heard and to make their own decisions.
Documents were allegedly taken from Diana Bryant’s car on Thursday Night. There was no sign of forced entry and the car was left open with no surveillance catching the alleged thief. The document had transcripts of Darceys Family Court Case and is unaware whether psychological reports were taken as well, but just two days ago, she was claiming that there were no concerns raised. A grieving Family states that the family court were aware for two years – Why would a grieving family lie about such a thing? There is no incentive, no one has ever sued the Family Court before. Our children have lost so many privileges available prior to the age of suing, yet the family court is probably the only establishment in this country that is allowed to proceed without risks. All she has to do is front up to an interview, make excuses and then leave as she has done before:
SENSITIVE documents relating to West Gate victim Darcey Freeman and her father have been stolen from a judge’s car in the city.
The documents were taken from a car belonging to Family Court Chief Justice Diana Bryant.
The theft, on Thursday night, occurred only hours before Darcey was buried at a private funeral yesterday.
Darcey, 4, was allegedly thrown from the West Gate Bridge by her father Arthur on January 29, which was to have been her first day at school.
The Herald Sun believes the theft of the briefcase, which contained several files, did not involve forced entry.
The car may have been left open in Little Collins St, about 40m west of Spring St.
Police have been told the theft occurred between 7pm and midnight, but have not found security footage to identify the culprit.
A search of nearby lanes did not find the briefcase and police have made an urgent appeal for witnesses.
It is not known whether the thief knew of the contents of the briefcase.
The documents include transcripts of the Freemans’ case.
It is not known if the material contains psychological reports.
In a statement released on Thursday, Darcey’s relatives said the justice system had ignored their fears about her safety and had failed to prevent her death. Chief Justice Bryant confirmed a Family Court judge’s car had been broken into and personal items, including a briefcase, stolen.
“There were no court files, but the papers included a transcript,” she said.
Earlier, Chief Justice Bryant revealed she had reviewed all relevant reports relating to the Darcey Freeman case.
She was to hand over all available documents to the federal Attorney-General next week, after he called for a review of the Freeman matter.
“We’ll co-operate in whatever way in making available to him all of the material and events that occurred,” she said on ABC radio.
But she said the judicial system was not told of concerns that Darcey was at risk.
Federal Attorney-General Robert McClelland has asked his department to review the family’s case.
“(This area of the law) is an extremely difficult area, and if there is anything we can learn from this tragedy to improve how the system is run, we will not hesitate to take the necessary action,” Mr McClelland said in a statement.
Victorian Premier John Brumby welcomed the review.
“Anybody who has family or friends who dealt with (this area of the law), you know the system isn’t perfect,” he said.
“I think it’s very timely to review this case and to see the way in which it was managed.
“It’s a federal responsibility and I think the sooner that review’s undertaken, the better.”
– Anthony Dowsley and Natalie Tkaczuk Sikora
You must be logged in to post a comment.