The PAS Racket

Networks of lawyers, GALs, mediators, psychologists, therapists, parenting coordinators, et. al. collude and conspire in these Parental AlienationFraud cases. The mother and children are attacked every step of the way. The GAL may ask to speak with the children. The GAL then calls in a child abuse report, intentionally, or this may be done in response to a domestic violence injunction. The GAL then calls in one or more of this network of therapists and evaluators to attack the mother and children from every angle. All accusing the victims while exonerating the perpetrator who pays hefty “legal bills” and “evaluation bills”, basically buying visitation and/or custody in this racketeering fraud. It’s like black market human trafficking with the appearance of legitimacy, all done with virtual immunity through the court system.

Here is one such brutal example that was overturned on appeal to Florida’s 4th DCA. The guardian ad litem, Vicki Plant, has been involved in multiple cases using the same psychologists and same strategy to further victimize abused women and children. The therapist, Dahlia Biller has also worked with Vicki Plant on other cases using the same strategy. Also, involved in this vicious attack on the mother and children was Martha Jacobson as evaluator, and Jan Faust as undisclosed expert. Interestingly, Jan Faust owns a home with the judge on the case, Susan Greenhawt perBroward County Public Records book 44956, page 1035. This fraudulent custody change caused severe trauma to mother and children with one of the children having to be hospitalized. This sadistic group continued to inflict harm by blaming the mother and depriving the child of the mother’s love and support.

The family continues to suffer as the children are under 18 and litigation continues.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2005
S.S. Appellant, v. P.S. Appellee.
CASE NO. 4D04-455
Opinion filed January 19, 2005

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit
Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Susan F. Greenhawt, Judge;
L.T. Case No. FMCE 03-15749 3793.

Lynn G. Waxman of Lynn G. Waxman, P.A.,
West Palm Beach, Sari Teichman Addicott and
Michael L. Addicott of Addicott & Addicott,
P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.

Nancy W. Gregoire and Joel L. Kirschbaum of
Bunnell, Woulfe, Kirschbaum, Keller, McIntyre
& Gregoire, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion for rehearing, withdraw
the opinion issued on November 10, 2004, and
substitute the following.

Appellant, S.S., appeals from
the non-final Order on Temporary Injunction for
Protection Against Domestic Violence and Other
Temporary Relief. She argues that she was
deprived of due process at the hearing because,
contrary to Florida Family Law Rule of
Procedure 12.363(b)(1) (2003), the trial court
permitted the use of the custody evaluation
psychological report which was completed and
delivered to appellant’s counsel the day before
the hearing. We agree and reverse.
Pursuant to section 741.30, Florida Statutes
(2003), the trial court held a hearing on the
temporary injunction for protection against
domestic violence issued against appellee and
considered the issue of custody of the children
of the parties. Two months before the hearing a
custody evaluator was appointed. On Sunday,
the day before the hearing, which had been
continued twice, the report was completed and
delivered to the parties’ attorneys. The report
was thirty-five pages single-spaced and
recommended that the children be removed from
appellant’s custody due to the severe alienation
of the children by their mother (appellant) from
their father. Finding that the circumstances
amounted to an emergency, the trial court, over
the repeated objections of appellant that she
needed more time to prepare, permitted the
testimony of the psychologist, which was based
upon the report.

We find that the circumstances of this case do
not rise to the level of the extraordinary
circumstances required to find a true emergency
as held in Stanley-Baker v. Baker, 789 So. 2d
353, 355 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Thus, the trial
court’s decision to permit the testimony of the
psychologist that was based upon her report,
which was received by appellant the day before
the hearing, was an abuse of discretion and
deprived appe llant of procedural due process.
See Crifaci v. Crifaci, 626 So. 2d 287, 288 (Fla.
4th DCA 1993).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR
FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
GUNTHER, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ.,
concur.

Maternal Envy – Part One

Long before the approach of separation in cases of intimate terrorism is a phenomena that eats away at the core of her very being.  Some call it Maternal Alienation, but I feel that there is an even deeper aspect that is underlying the very structure of it.  Many times before survivors have been able to name the jealousy that eats away at the ones they tried to love and easily interpret how male family members and even some friends were seen as a threat to these green eyed monsters, but rarely have we delved into the core of why these men stalk through the courts seeking to rob mothers of their children with such destructivity and ferocity.  In the book of “Men and Masculinities” it creates an accurate picture of the envy that some fathers feel towards the bond between a mother and her child.

Intimate partner terrorists already expressing jealousy towards her achievements, friendships and talents, feels an overwhelming rage over this new bond.  For the first time, he has no control over her and her relationship.  The love and attention that pours into her baby within the first few months are often always more as his role in the spotlight diminishes.  So to regain the control over these relationships, he indulges in his efforts to sever this new bond.  Often the first choice is to conquer this new life and seek this child’s unconditional love and obedience.  Love in his world is complete submission to all his unworldly desires.  If the child is a boy, he will dominate his education in the next generation of perpetrators.  In his world, the boy must learn to see his mother as “below him”.  Displaying tyranny in front of the boy is the education that the intimate terrorist begins to teach, so he will learn that he must like his father, to cage these “wild women” to conform to his every need.  

The Alienation Debate

A Father Wrote:

you will never convince those of us that have suffered and have seen our children suffer under Pa, that Pas dose not exist, it is real when you are the targeted. although i don’t agree with all that Gardner says, it is delusional to think it does not exist, may i respectfully suggest that it is the rejection of the concept of pas that initself does more damage to ncp’s, yes parents not just mums or dads. if parents have lost their children through pas either as the targetd one or as the perpetrator then they need to recognise and understand what has happened before they will get any where and before the children will benefit and after all that is what we as parents are chartered to do as best as we can. members of both genders have been guilty, not just mums. to deny pas exists is to bury one’s head in the sand.  

Anonymums Response:

• PAS against mothers and mothers only. Richard Gardner classed substantiated cases of child sexual abuse as “Alienation” He wanted to decriminalize pedophilia and wrote this in his books. Like Dean Tong, and many others who have been convicted for abusing their mothers and children use this as an excuse for their behavior. 
• Alienation originated from the studies conducted on the disclosures of convicted pedophiles. Maternal Alienation was part of a series of behaviors that was used to silence the child in the early grooming stages. The maternal bond is the strongest bond that the offender seeks to break. Once that this is broken, the child is truly isolated and groomed for the next stage. 
• Similar patterns have emerged in the studies of intimate partner terrorism that effects one in three women. Men guilty of these actions were cross classes and professions, some lingered in psychology like the infamous Richard Gardner whom knew that if he could twist such a thing around and gather the support of divorced fathers – Many would flock to his uprising.  
• On a global level mothers are the ones that are truly alienated in the media, the law, schools and culture in general. We are seen as a great burden to society despite our tireless efforts. 
• Fathers Rights tend to try and equalize something that cannot be truly equal unless it were scientifically possible for fathers to bear the birth of children. Instead it is something tyrannical and quite sinister to consider women as merely “baby factories” with no added rights to balance the unbalanced scales. In the encyclopedia for men and masculinities it states that some men experience a maternal jealousy of the maternal bond and whilst some rise above such things, others manifest in dysfunctional manners. The bond between a mother and a child is always stronger than of the father as the baby hears the mothers voice and is soothed subconsciously by her later on.  
• Paternal alienation perceives any expression of closeness such as breast-feeding, concerns for the child’s well being and loving interactions as something sinister and vindictive. Thus the maternal jealously rages on in a court room run mostly by men.  
• The evidence of domestic violence does not get through because Australia has the second highest globally male dominated police force.  
• It is in fact impossible to say that men have a disadvantage in the courts because 70% of the legislation is male dominated. Most of the media is run by men and the few women who speak of women’s issues are coined as “feminazis”

Effective lies to get Custody…

I write this, because I have faith that many mothers understand the consequences they face when the child becomes an adult and don’t lie in custody battles unless they are intimidated to conceal the abuse.  I have decided to debunk this silly charade with some lies that would be far more effective in custody battles:

• My ex is a terrorist – There are far more protections and you are treated with more dignity for reporting these crimes.  
• I left because he slept with a man – There are few family courts that support the rights of people who are gay.

•  He is a satanic worshipper – Most Family courts are heavily influenced by christian philosophies, particularly the patriarchal ideals which often get in the way of the “best Interests of the child”.

• He writes articles on feminism- Anyone man or women who have feminist ideals in these courts are treated poorly.

• He has delusions of Grandeur – Case dismissed!