Relationship Break up Prompts Murder

Accused killer ‘asked for car, clothes’

February 19, 2009, 12:35 pm

function pop(url, title, x, y){ rm=window.open(url,title,’width=’+x+’,height=’+y+’,resizable=no,scrollbars=yes,status=0′); if (rm != null) { rm.focus(); if (rm.opener == null ) rm.opener = self;} }

A man accused of gunning down his one-time girlfriend asked a friend for fresh clothes and a loan of a car after the shooting, a Melbourne court has been told.

Leigh Robinson, 60, of Pearcedale, has been charged with murdering 33-year-old mother of two Tracey Greenbury on April 28 last year.

The court earlier heard Ms Greenbury huddled in fear on a neighbour’s doorstep as the accused pointed a gun at her.

Ms Greenbury fell into the Frankston house and crawled along the floor as the door was opened, but died after she was shot by the man in the doorway.

Robinson’s committal hearing on Thursday was told he had called his friend of over 20 years, William Paterson, and told him there had been a shooting.

Mr Paterson said Robinson asked to borrow a car and later requested some clothes which he arranged for him.

Mr Paterson said he learned that night Tracey, who he had known as Robinson’s girlfriend, had been shot dead.

He said shortly after learning that fact Robinson called him and Mr Paterson told him “she’s gone”.

“He was just sort of stuttering and hesitating,” Mr Paterson said.

Mr Paterson said Robinson and Ms Greenbury had been in a relationship, but it appeared to fall apart about two weeks before the shooting.

He said Mr Robinson had said it was over and appeared upset by the breakup.

The pre-trial hearing in Melbourne Magistrates’ Court continues.

From News.com.au 30th April 2008

THE man believed to have shot dead Frankston mother Tracey Greenbury is a convicted killer who was sentenced to death in 1968 for the brutal stabbing murder of his former girlfriend.

Leigh Robinson, 60, is on the run after allegedly blasting Ms Greenbury to death with a shotgun on Monday as she ran from her house in a desperate attempt to escape him.

Police believe he is still armed and have urged people not to approach him.

As the manhunt widened yesterday, Ms Greenbury’s parents spoke of how they had feared for their daughter’s safety in the weeks leading to her murder.

Ms Greenbury, 33, who had only begun seeing Robinson in the past few months, told her parents two weeks ago that he had held her hostage in a caravan and held a gun to her head, threatening to kill her.

Max Greenbury said his daughter had tried to end her relationship with Robinson after discovering his criminal history, but was terrified of him.

“She was so frightened and was convinced he was going to come back. She told me, ‘Dad, I don’t want to die, I am too young’,” Mr Greenbury said.

Robinson has a history of crime and violence dating back to the 1960s. He spent 15 years in prison after he stabbed to death 17-year-old Valerie Ethel Dunn in the kitchen of her Chadstone home in June 1968.

Pentridge Prison psychiatrist Alan Bartholomew told a committal hearing later that year that Robinson, then aged 20, was an “odd” character. “He told me he was having dreams that he would assassinate several people,” Dr Bartholomew told the court.

Legendary Melbourne criminal barrister Frank Galbally, who represented Robinson at the committal, also told the court: “He dreamed he would kill this girl and has since had dreams of killing someone else.”

At Robinson’s trial, evidence was given that he stabbed Ms Dunn 16 times with a carving knife after she refused to go out with him. He had also stabbed and wounded a youth who intervened to help Ms Dunn.

On 28 November, 1968, Robinson was sentenced to hang for Ms Dunn’s murder, but five months later his sentence was commuted to 30 years in prison, with a minimum of 20.

For this Robinson may owe something to the legacy of Ronald Ryan, who in 1967 became the last man to be hanged in Australia. After a massive public campaign to save Ryan, the death penalty was never used again and was formally abolished in Victoria by the Hamer government in 1975.

Having avoided execution, Robinson served 15 years in Pentridge, where he is believed to have been a quiet prisoner, spending much time lifting weights and participating in drama and debating before his release in 1983.

Seen and Heard: Child saves families lives

This story is an excellent example of why we need to start listening to the children:

Zoe Budden saves her family with quick thinking

Article from: Sunday Herald Sun

Wendy Hargreaves

February 15, 2009 12:00am

A QUICK-THINKING eight-year-old girl saved her entire family seconds before her Marysville home exploded in flames.

Zoe Budden packed bags for each of her three younger siblings and ordered her parents to leave early, preventing certain tragedy.



“We wouldn’t be here if it wasn’t for Zoe,” her proud father Jason said.

“When we saw the smoke, we were all running around trying to grab things, but Zoe was the prepared one. She had already packed bags for each of the kids and loaded them in the car. She was so organised.

“We would have still been in the house, but she insisted that we leave.

“If it wasn’t for Zoe, we wouldn’t have survived. I have no doubt about that. I believe she was led by God on that day.”

Zoe, a grade 3 student at Marysville Primary, was the guiding light for her brother Reuben, 6, and sisters Febe, 4, and Rebeca, 2.

While her mother Renee was still collecting valuables, Zoe had loaded her sibling’s bags into the car.

 

Choose your news

Zoe Budden

Brave heart: Zoe Budden’s quick thinking helped save her entire family. Picture: Tony Gough

Tiger Cares for Piglets and Vice-Versa

Tiger Cares for Piglets and Vice-Versa

February 12, 2009 by admin1
Filed under: Cool Stuff 

The Sriracha Tiger Zoo in Thailand is famous for their unique attractions, fun shows, and the ability for tourists to get close to (and often touch) the tigers. However, the most famous attraction is the couplings of pigs and tigers:

tiger-and-piglets1

These pictures show two year old Saimai, a Royal Bengal tigress, with the six piglets she is raising.

tiger-and-piglets-two

The tiger doesn’t seem to mind the unclothed piglets, so I’m guessing the costumes were just meant to put on a cute show for the tourists. Either that or she ate the first set of tiger-clad piglets and the zoo hasn’t had time to create new outfits.

tiger-and-piglets-three

While the zoo and all press materials claim the pairings are completely benevolent, I personally wonder if Saimai just views her pig-raising duties as a long “getting ready for dinner” ritual.

tiger-and-piglets-four

Fittingly, Saimai herself was cared for and nursed by a pig:

sow-nurses-tiger

from our friends

Florida Mom Loses Custody Battle-Now May Never See Daughter Again

Florida Mom Loses Custody Battle-Now May Never See Daughter Again

Haleigh Cummings was reported missing from her father, Ronald Cumming’s home on Tuesday, February 10th, 2009. About 3 a.m., the father’s 17 year old girlfriend, Mistie Croslin, reportedly discovered that the 5 year old girl was missing. There appear to be some conflicting reports regarding the disappearance. Either the girlfriend or the child went to the bathroom at approximately 3 a.m., right around the time the father was reportedly getting home from work. This was allegedly when the child was discovered to be missing. The girl’s younger brother, Ronald Jr. was also in the home, but was not involved and is reportedly alright and accounted for. 

Besides this being another disturbing story of yet another child missing, especially in Florida, there are some other disturbing issues, such as the fact that the father was quite proud of “winning” a custody battle and taking these children from their mother. The father also claims to have had “false allegations” made against him by the mother and grandmother. The father also has an underage girlfriend of 17 living with him. (Isn’t this allegedly statutory rape?) The father also insulted and verbally abused the girlfriend to the police by reportedly telling officers that his“dumb bitch girlfriend” told him Haleigh was gone when he got home from work.

The mother, Crystal Sheffield, had not seen or spoken to her daughter for two weeks, due to the father having custody. Crystal had reported domestic violence, but like so many women found herself re-victimized in the courts. Instead of receiving protection and help, this mom did not receive a protective order due to claims of insufficient evidence per Baker County Records. Later, it appears she was prosecuted for trying to get protection. This is very common where women who have children cannot receive protection. They are unfairly portrayed as being vindictive instead of being truly in fear for their own safety and the safety of their children. The result of this horrible re-victimization in court is the loss of custody of the children. Sheffield said she believed her two children with Cummings – Haleigh and Ronald Jr. – would have been safer with her.  Perhaps this custody arrangement was NOT in the children’s best interest. 

The Fox News interview with Greta Van Susteren is heartbreaking.

Video interview with mom, Crystal Sheffield, and grandma, Marie Griffis

 

Transcript from Fox News interview with Greta Van Susteren

GRETA VAN SUSTEREN, FOX NEWS HOST: Tonight, where is little Haleigh? She’s only 5, a little girl, and her whereabouts a mystery, a terrifying mystery. With every tick of the clock, fear intensifies. Now, here’s what we know. At 3:00 AM Monday morning, the girlfriend of Haleigh’s father notices the girl missing from the bed the two were sharing. About 25 minutes later, Haleigh’s father reportedly comes home from work. His girlfriend tells him Haleigh is gone. Then two minutes later, at 3:27 AM, the girlfriend calls 911 and reports Haleigh missing.

(BEGIN AUDIO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I just woke up, and our back door was open, and I can’t find my daughter.

911 OPERATOR: Can’t find what?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: My daughter.

911 OPERATOR: OK. What’s your address?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE:Green Lane (ph) (INAUDIBLE)

911 OPERATOR: What’s the numerical?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: The numerical? What’s that?

911 OPERATOR: The number. Green Lane?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Yes.

911 OPERATOR: OK, when did you last see her?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: We just, like — you know, it was about 10:00 o’clock. She was sleeping (INAUDIBLE)

911 OPERATOR: OK. How old is your daughter?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: She’s 5.

911 OPERATOR: OK. What was she last seen wearing?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: (INAUDIBLE)

911 OPERATOR: Ma’am?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: She was in her pajamas. We were sleeping.

911 OPERATOR: OK. All right. You said your back door was wide open?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Yes, with a brick. Like, there was a brick on the floor. Like, when I went to sleep, the door was not like that.

911 OPERATOR: OK, the back door — listen to me. Your back door was wide open? What are you talking about a brick?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: (INAUDIBLE)

911 OPERATOR: What is the brick?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: It’s on the back door, on the — on the stairs (INAUDIBLE) like, a walkway?

911 OPERATOR: And there was a brick laying there?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Yes. It’s still there.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: (INAUDIBLE) come on!

911 OPERATOR: We got them coming. Tell him we got them coming.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: They’re coming.

(END AUDIO CLIP)

VAN SUSTEREN: Since that 911 call, a massive search has fanned out, looking for the toddler by land, by water and door to door, but no results. Joining us by phone is Putnam County sheriff Jeff Hardy. Good evening, Sheriff. And last night, or at least some point after that 911 call was received and sheriffs reported to the home, I understand some tracks were seen, sir?

SHERIFF JEFF HARDY, PUTNAM COUNTY: Greta, are you talking about the bloodhounds and a little bit of the tracking? Is that what you’re referring to?

VAN SUSTEREN: Yes, and there was also apparently a footprint in the dirt. I don’t know if that was a recent print or whether that was an old one. But what can you tell me about efforts to at least search to see whether or not you can determine where the child may have gone?

HARDY: Greta, we called in a team of bloodhounds, and they — several different bloodhound units. And they came out. And I’m sure you know these bloodhounds, their noses are very sensitive, and they did follow some tracking, but we don’t know exactly how old the tracks could have been. And as far as the footprint that you’re talking about, that’s news to me. I don’t know of any footprint at this point.

VAN SUSTEREN: All right. I think what it was, was some sort of — at least, there was one report there was some — some sort of footprint or step in the dirt that might have been the child’s, and nothing more. But we’re hearing lots of different information. And obviously, Sheriff, you’re the one on the story, so I’ll defer to you on that. All right, in terms of the child missing, have there been any tips that the child has been spotted in the last 24 hours?

HARDY: No, ma’am, we don’t have any tips, but we are following up on all leads that we’re receiving. In fact, we’re in the middle of conducting several interviews as we speak right now, Greta.

VAN SUSTEREN: One of — the person who first reported the child missing was the girlfriend to the father. Her name is Misty. She was — she apparently had gone — she had last seen the child about 10:00 PM the night before and that the child was sleeping in the same bed with her? Is that correct?

HARDY: That’s what she’s telling us, Greta, yes.

VAN SUSTEREN: Was any — was the — was there another child in the bed, as well? Because I know there’s another child in the home.

HARDY: No, there was a brother in the home, a younger brother.

VAN SUSTEREN: But he wasn’t in the same bed with the girlfriend and the missing child?

HARDY: No, ma’am. He was — I believe he was in another room, another bed or another — another bedding area. I don’t believe he was on the same bed, no.

VAN SUSTEREN: All right. So according to least what I hear, and correct me if I’m wrong, she wakes up or something about 3:00 o’clock, notices the child missing, but a phone call is not made for 27 minutes to 911. Is that correct?

HARDY:Well, I can verify the fact that our 911 call did come in at 3:27 AM. As far as exactly the timeline of when she woke up and discovered the child missing, I don’t know. She’s saying it is some time after 3:00.

VAN SUSTEREN: Is the girlfriend a person of interest to you at this point?

HARDY:Greta, we’re not ruling out anybody. You know, we have teams of law enforcement officers out here right now. We’ve continued our grounds searches by air and by water. We still have dive teams. We had them out here today. Again, the FBI’s out here assisting us with other — just numerous local and state officials and officers from across northeast Florida. So we’re not ruling anybody out at this point.

VAN SUSTEREN: Sheriff, thank you, sir. And good luck, sir.

HARDY: And thank you for your time.

VAN SUSTEREN:Joining us live from Florida, Haleigh’s mother, Crystal Sheffield, and the toddler’s grandmother, Marie Griffis. Crystal, I know you that you’re terrible distressed and worried this evening. Do you — is there any likelihood in your mind that this child simply just got up and walked off?

CRYSTAL SHEFFIELD, MOTHER: No, there is not. She would not do that.

VAN SUSTEREN: Crystal, when was the last time you saw your daughter?

SHEFFIELD: Two weeks ago.

VAN SUSTEREN: Have you spoken to her in the last two weeks?

SHEFFIELD: No, I have not.

VAN SUSTEREN: When you saw her, did she indicate or say to you anything to suggest there were problems in the home? I know that she’s living with her father, or staying with her father and her father’s girlfriend. Did she say there were any problems in the home?

SHEFFIELD: No.

VAN SUSTEREN: Marie, when was the last time that you saw your grandchild?

MARIE GRIFFIS, GRANDMOTHER: It was two weeks ago when they got their visitation to come stay with us (INAUDIBLE) We pick them up Friday night 6:00 o’clock and we return them Sunday at 6:00 o’clock.

VAN SUSTEREN: Marie, do you live in the area or do you live out of state?

GRIFFIS:We live in Florida, but it’s Baker County, Glenn St. Mary (ph), Florida. We live about an hour and 45 minutes from here.

VAN SUSTEREN: Marie, do you know of any problems in that home?

GRIFFIS: In the past, Haleigh and Junior have told us that, you know, they’ve been hit and stuff like that, but up to this point, everything was fine.

VAN SUSTEREN: Crystal, have you spoken to the father of your child or his girlfriend in the last 24 hours?

SHEFFIELD: I spoke to him yesterday. I have not spoken to his girlfriend.

VAN SUSTEREN: What did he say to you?

SHEFFIELD: He just said that — he told me he was sorry and that if he would have been home from work that it would have never happened.

VAN SUSTEREN: Marie, what do you think has happened? I know that there are a lot of theories, a lot of sex offenders in the area. What are you sort of — you know, where is your suspicion tonight, Marie?

GRIFFIS: My suspicions is why is it two children was in the bed with this 17-year-old girl, and somebody comes into the home and picks a child up that’s laying right next to you and you don’t know where she went. You get up and go to the bathroom and come back and she’s not there. Well, was she there when she got up and went to the bathroom? Why don’t we have that information? What happened? It don’t take but 15, 20 seconds to go to the bathroom, and it’s right there in the bedroom, also. So I wonder what role Misty plays in this.

VAN SUSTEREN: Have you ever met her, Marie?

GRIFFIS: I have never officially been introduced to her. I saw her in Ronald’s car one weekend when we took Haleigh and Junior back to their dad on a Sunday, and she was sitting in the car. And I don’t know who she is, never spoke to her. All I know is Haleigh and Junior told me that they liked her, that she was nice to them.

GRIFFIS: Crystal, do you know the girlfriend at all? I mean, have you ever, like, had any conversations with her in any depth? Do you know what kind of person she is, anything about her?

SHEFFIELD: No, I don’t. I’ve talked to her. She seemed like a really nice person, but I’ve never sat down and had a conversation with her. And the kids told me that…

VAN SUSTEREN: Marie, I don’t mean to…

SHEFFIELD: … They loved her.

VAN SUSTEREN: How long, Crystal, has she been in the children’s lives?

SHEFFIELD: Probably four to six months? I’m not really sure.

VAN SUSTEREN: Marie, I don’t want to — you know, because I’m asking questions about the girlfriend (INAUDIBLE) you know, think that she’s the only person I’m curious about. I mean, obviously, everybody — we’re curious about everybody tonight. Do you know anything, Marie, about any neighbors at all, people who live nearby that have shown any particular interest to this child at all, Marie, do you know?

GRIFFIS: The only thing we know about any neighbors is there were some kids that lived next door that Haleigh and Junior played with, and they were seen out playing in the yard around 5:00 o’clock yesterday — or Monday evening. I guess it was Monday evening. I can’t even remember anymore. The days are just running together now.

VAN SUSTEREN: Crystal, the father of your child was at work when, apparently, Haleigh disappeared. What kind of work does he do, Crystal?

SHEFFIELD: I’m not sure. All I know is he runs a crane.

VAN SUSTEREN: Do you know, Marie, why he was out until 3:00 o’clock in the morning? I mean, what kind of work would have him out that late, or that early, depending on how you characterize it?

GRIFFIS:He — we was ere told he worked from 3:00 to 3:00, so I supposed it’s a 12-hour shift. And he’s a crane operator working for a place called PDM Bridge (ph).

VAN SUSTEREN: Do either of you know if the girlfriend has a job or does any kind of work at all?

SHEFFIELD: No.

GRIFFIS: No.

VAN SUSTEREN:Crystal, Marie, thank you both very much. And you know, I certainly hope we can find this child. And there’s so much publicity being cast on it that maybe someone knows something and will call in maybe we’ll have good news on this soon. Thank you both.

SHEFFIELD: Thank you.

GRIFFIS: Yes, thank you very much, too.

VAN SUSTEREN: Up next, more breaking news coverage on the search for little Haleigh. The toddler’s father will be here to go “On the Record.”

Plus: Do you like pork? Not to eat, but as part of the massive stimulus bill. Well, guess what? A powerful senator says you don’t care about pork. What? Is that true? Or is he drinking? We’ll see.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

VAN SUSTEREN: We continue our breaking news coverage on the disappearance of little Haleigh Cummings. She was reported missing 3:30 AM yesterday morning. Now, here’s what we know, is that the father’s girlfriend apparently last saw the child about 10:00 PM on Monday night when she went to bed and the child was in the same bed. About 3:00 o’clock in the morning, the girlfriend says that she got up to go to the bathroom, noticed the child was missing. About 27 minutes later, at 3:27 AM, the father in the meantime had come home from work, according to the parents — according — has — was at work and he called 911, and the child has been missing — or reported missing at that time.

Now, Haleigh’s father, Ronald Cummings, joins us live, along with Crystal Cummings, Ronald’s sister. Good evening to both of you. And Ronald, I know how distressed you are because everyone has told me. And the only thing I can hope is that we can at least shed more light on it and get more information so that people call in with tips.

So let me — let’s — let me try to ask you some questions about it. What time did you arrive home, Ronald, on Tuesday morning?

RONALD CUMMINGS, FATHER: Approximately 3:30.

VAN SUSTEREN: And when you walked in the door — take me through every step. You walked in the door. Was your girlfriend up at that point?

RONALD CUMMINGS: Yes. I never walked through the door. I pulled in the yard. She — the door was open. She was standing there and waiting on me. I asked her what she was still doing up, and she then told me that the back — she got up to use the restroom, and the back door was wide open and that my daughter was missing.

VAN SUSTEREN: Was the child — was your daughter missing when she got up to use the restroom, or between the time she got up to use the restroom and returned to bed? Did she tell you that?

RONALD CUMMINGS: I’m not sure. I never asked.

VAN SUSTEREN: Crystal, when was the last time…

RONALD CUMMINGS: I’m just worried about where she’s at.

VAN SUSTEREN: No, I understand that. Crystal, when was the last time you saw this child?

CRYSTAL CUMMINGS, AUNT: A couple weeks ago.

VAN SUSTEREN: Crystal, have you ever noticed the child wanting to wander off or any people wanting — in the neighborhood, unusual people paying close attention to her that you thought was peculiar?

CRYSTAL CUMMINGS: No. She wouldn’t wander off.

VAN SUSTEREN: Ronald, do you agree that she would not just wander off?

RONALD CUMMINGS: Absolutely. I know my daughter like the back of my hand. I’ve raised her since the day she was 2 years old by myself. I know for a fact she would not wander off alone during in the daylight, much less at night. She’s afraid of the dark.

VAN SUSTEREN: Ronald, has anyone ever wandered into your home, any strangers into your home?

RONALD CUMMINGS: No.

VAN SUSTEREN: Ronald, always in every investigation, the person that people focus on are the people who last saw the child, so obviously, your girlfriend has got — you know, there’s a lot of focus on her. Is there any reason that you have any suspicion that your girlfriend knows more than she’s saying, Ronald?

RONALD CUMMINGS: No, there is not. And I would like for a lot of the false allegations to be discarded. There’s been a lot of false allegations made by the mother and her mother. And I just don’t — I don’t appreciate it. It’s not a custody battle. This here is about finding a 5-year-old missing child, my daughter.

VAN SUSTEREN: It’s unusual for a father to have custody. Why do you — did you win custody in a battle for this child?

RONALD CUMMINGS: Absolutely, I did.

VAN SUSTEREN: What happened? Explain — explain — you know — you know, usually, the mother gets the custody. Why did the court give you custody of your child?

RONALD CUMMINGS: The only way I can honestly answer you that without being rude to others is they chose the better parent and the one who could provide better for the two children.

VAN SUSTEREN: Crystal, what’s your — what’s your — what do you think in your heart and your mind tonight as to where this child is and what happened? What makes the most sense to you?

CRYSTAL CUMMINGS: I don’t — really can’t tell you what happened to her. I mean, I think someone took her. I just want them to bring her back.

VAN SUSTEREN: Ronald, let me ask you the same question. What’s your theory tonight? And I realize this is a very fluid situation, but what’s your — what do you think is the trail we should go down to look for this child? What do you think happened?

RONALD CUMMINGS: Somebody broke into my house and stole my daughter. I know because I specifically locked those doors before I left for work, and my child cannot unlock the deadbolt on that door because I have got the hole cut in a specific place where you have to force the door shut to get it to lock all the way. And I know it was locked all the way. I checked it myself. And she does not open the door for strangers or wander alone in the dark, nothing like that. So somebody broke into my home and stole my child.

VAN SUSTEREN: Was the door broken when you came home? Was that lock broken when you came home?

RONALD CUMMINGS: No. Obviously, a crowbar or something was used. I’m not sure. You’ll have to speak more with the detectives about what was used or how it was done. I’m not sure.

VAN SUSTEREN:Ronald, Crystal, thank you both very much, and I very much hope that we’re going to have good news and that child will be found, your daughter, Ronald, very soon and in good health. Thank you both.

CRYSTAL CUMMINGS: Thank you.

RONALD CUMMINGS: Yes, thank you.

 

Florida Sheriff: Girlfriend of Missing 5-Year-Old’s Father Took Polygraph

Thursday , February 12, 2009

The 17-year-old girlfriend of a missing Florida girl’s father has taken a lie detector test, a local sheriff said, but he wouldn’t reveal whether she passed.

Putnam County Sheriff Jeff Hardy declined to disclose the results Thursday of the polygraph given to Misty Croslin in the disappearance of Haleigh Ann-Marie Cummings, 5.

“Misty has been interviewed extensively and yes, she did take a polygraph,” he said.

Croslin was the one who reportedly discovered that Haleigh had vanished from her bed before dawn on Tuesday.

She is one of several people police and the FBI have interviewed in the case. All have been offered the chance to take a lie detector test, according to Putnam County Sheriff’s spokesman Gary Bowling.

Click here for photos.

Detectives believe Haleigh was abducted — and they aren’t overlooking anyone, including family members, as suspects.

Haleigh is 3 feet tall with blond hair and brown eyes. She was last seen wearing a pink shirt and underwear.

Hardy said ground searches continued for a third day on Thursday. Bloodhounds have been used, but haven’t turned up any clear evidence.

“We have nothing definitive to say where the child is based on the bloodhounds,” Hardy told reporters at a Thursday news conference.

He said evidence has been collected from the mobile home where Haleigh lived with her 3-year-old brother Junior, her father Ronald Cummings and Croslin — but declined to describe it.

“I can’t discuss what evidence was taken into custody,” Hardy said. “I don’t want to reveal what was found or not found.”

Ronald Cummings, told FOX News’ Greta Van Susteren that Croslin was watching his daughter while he was at work as a crane operator.

According to Cummings, Haleigh had gotten up to use the bathroom. When she didn’t return, Croslin went to look for her and noticed the back door was open.

“I locked doors before I left for work. My child cannot unlock the deadbolt, you have to force the door shut all the way … and she doesn’t open the door to strangers,” Cummings said.

Croslin and Cummings called 911 after discovering the girl was missing, according to the police report. The tapes were released Wednesday.

In addition to Croslin, Cummings and the child’s mother, Crystal Sheffield, as well as several others have been questioned in the case.

“It is never safe to say that a family member is not a suspect,” Bowling said Wednesday. “However, all the world is a suspect right now.”

Police have ruled out the possibility that the girl ran away.

“This child didn’t voluntarily walk out of her home. If she did, someone took her,” Bowling said.

Cummings, who has custody of Haleigh and her brother, said his daughter wouldn’t leave on her own.

“I know somebody took her. I know for a fact she didn’t wander off — she’s afraid of the dark,” Cummings told NBC’s “Today” on Thursday.

 

Police said house-to-house searches of the neighborhood Wednesday found no evidence that the child wandered away.

 

Police had never been called to the home in the past — but there havebeen prior problems with Cummings, Croslin and the children, according to Putnam County Capt. Steve Rose.

“There have been some investigations done through the department of children and family,” Rose told FOX News on Wednesday. He didn’t elaborate.

John Harrell, spokesman for the northeast region of the Florida Department of Children and Families, said Thursday that his agency “was involved with the family.” Harrell would not offer any details, citing state confidentiality laws.

 

Sheffield’s mother, Marie, told Van Susterenthat the children seemed to be doing well living with their father.

“Haleigh told us they’ve been hit, and stuff like that, but to this point, everything was fine,” Marie Sheffield said.

There were still no firm leads in the case. Detectives wouldn’t say whether Croslin, Cummings or anyone else in the family were a focus of the investigation.

Haleigh’s grandfather, Johnny Sheffield, said he was distraught about the girl’s disappearance and characterized Croslin as suspicious, though he admitted he didn’t know much about her, according to MyFOXOrlando.com.

Sheffield told Van Susteren that her children loved their father’s girlfriend, whom he’d been dating for 4 to 6 months.

“She seemed like a really nice person, but I never sat down and had a conversation with her,” she said.

Appearing on FOX News on Thursday, Sheffield answered “yes” when asked whether it was true that Croslin had given conflicting statements to police.

The child’s mother doesn’t live in the area but traveled to Putnam County after she learned of her daughter’s disappearance and has been interviewed, according to Rose.

“She is cooperating,” Rose told FOX News on Wednesday.

Cummings said his girlfriend was awake and frantic after she found Haleigh was gone. But in the police report, obtained by FOX News, Cummings reportedly told officers that his “dumb bitch girlfriend”told him Haleigh was gone when he got home from work.

“Ronald said that he did not know what Haleigh was wearing, and that all he knew was that the back door was standing open. Ronald repeatedly said that someone had taken his child and also said ‘When I find him I’ll kill him,’” police wrote in the report.

He referred to a 9mm Beretta handgun he owns and said if authorities found his daughter’s kidnapper, “he would shoot them through the back window of the patrol car,” the police report said.

Deputies said Thursday they’re in the process of questioning 44 registered sex offenders who live within five miles of Haleigh’s home.

An uncle, Andrew Sheffield, believes she is alive, but the mystery of her whereabouts continues.

“It’s fishy,” he said. “Somebody knows something.”

George Anthony, the grandfather of slain Florida toddler CayleeAnthony, met with Haleigh’s father Thursday. Anthony said he was there simply to offer moral support.

Anyone with information about the girl is urged to contact the Putnam County Sheriff’s Office at (386) 329-0800 or 911.

Click here for more on this story from MyFOXOrlando.com.

FOXNews.com’s Catherine Donaldson-Evans and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Man loses appeal for conviction over wife shot by ‘Bruce Willis’

Man loses appeal for conviction over wife shot by ‘Bruce Willis’

Article from: The Courier-Mail

Mark Oberhardt

February 06, 2009 11:00pm

A BITTER husband hired a hitman named “Bruce Willis” to kill his childhood sweetheart turned estranged wife, a court has been told.

In the Court of Appeal in Brisbane, Steven John Clark, 35, was appealing his conviction and 16-year jail sentence for attempting to murder Sonya Maree Clark at her Ipswich home on April 16, 2004.

The court was told the Clarks were childhood sweethearts but things turned sour and they were locked in a Family Court dispute over their two children and joint property.

Ms Clark was shot in the stomach when she answered the door of her Brassall home to a man who identified himself as the Hollywood action hero.

The gunman, who is still wanted, escaped in a white van.

It was alleged Clark told friends of his plans to hire someone to kill his wife.

His lawyers argued he had been in Quilpie, 12 hours away in western Queensland, on the night of the shooting.

But it was the Crown case that he had hired the unknown gunman to kill his wife.

Clark appealed on several grounds including his conviction had been a miscarriage of justice.

In a unanimous judgment the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeals against the conviction and sentence.

Industrialized Motherhood: The Family Court baby Factories

Industrialized Motherhood: The Family Court baby Factories

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Periodicals & Report children global

Doctor Who Intentionally Severs Bonds With Mothers Is a Monster

Doctor Who Intentionally Severs Bonds With Mothers Is a Monster

– batteredmomslosecustody

This Dr. Harry Harlow was not just unsympathetic, but a monster just like the unethical doctors who forcefully remove children from loving mothers by claiming parental alienation to give them to their abusers are. Why do they do this? Because they get paid by the abuser to do this! It’s a fraud on the courts that needs to end!

From the Top Ten Unethical Psychological Experiments
The Well of Despair 1960

 

     Dr. Harry Harlowwas an unsympathetic person, using terms like the rape rack and iron maiden in his experiments. He is most well-known for the experiments he conducted on rhesus monkeys concerning social isolation. Dr. Harlow took infant rhesus monkeys who had already bonded with their mothers and placed them in a stainless steel vertical chamber device alone with no contact in order to sever those bonds. They were kept in the chambers for up to one year. Many of these monkeys came out of the chamber psychotic, and many did not recover. Dr. Harlow concluded that even a happy, normal childhood was no defense against depression, while science writer Deborah Blum called these, common sense results.
     Gene Sackett of the University of Washington in Seattle, one of Harlows doctoral students, stated he believes the animal liberation movement in the U.S. was born as a result of Harlows experiments. William Mason, one of Harlows students, said that Harlow kept this going to the point where it was clear to many people that the work was really violating ordinary sensibilities, that anybody with respect for life or people would find this offensive. Its as if he sat down and said, Im only going to be around another ten years. What Id like to do, then, is leave a great big mess behind. If that was his aim, he did a perfect job.

Any doctor removing a child from their mother using the fraudulent theory of parental alienation or other phony psychobabble BS needs to be exposed for the monster they are. They come up with phony rhetoric and say it in a convincing manner, much like they did back in Salem when they accused women of witchcraft.  

This Parental Alienation Custody Change Fraud is going to go down in history as one of the most unethical psychological social engineering experiments of all time. The scandal is on the same level as the cover up of sexual abuse by the Catholic Church. It’s time people start to wake up and recognize that these doctors are covering up for all types of domestic abuse against women and children for PROFIT.

 

If you click on the links regarding Dr. Harry Harlow, you will find out that he received awards from psychological associations. Maybe this will start to get people thinking that there are groups of people doing unethical experiments and they do support each other on their theories and cover up for each other. The APA also published the Rind Study which tried to justify child sexual abuse as being acceptable and not that harmful to children. There is a common thread between all of these sick studies that push quack theories to justify unacceptable behavior. Only with Parental Alienation Theory, the whole idea is to call the victims liars which re-victimizes them. All that is needed to do this is to pay an unethical doctor to testify who will ignore real evidence and substitute in their fraudulent rhetoric.

 

When people realized the horrible treatment of animals that Harlow inflicted, the result was an animal liberation movement. What needs to happen as a result of these unethical prental alienation scams is for children to have a liberation movement and demand to have rights to be heard and to make their own decisions.

Doctor is son’s grandpa

Doctor is son’s grandpa

Article from: Herald Sun

Shelley Hadfield

February 11, 2009 12:00am

A MELBOURNE doctor had a four-year sexual relationship with his daughter and fathered her child.

The doctor met his adult daughter in 1991 and their son was born in 1995. The daughter had been adopted out soon after she was born in the 1960s.

It is reminiscent of the case of a South Australian father and daughter, who made headlines last year when they showed their nine-month-old daughter on a television program.

In the Victorian County Court on Friday, the doctor was sentenced to a 12-month jail term suspended for two years.

The daughter has not been charged.

The Medical Practitioners Board is seeking legal advice about whether it can suspend his licence to practise.

The judge said the doctor should have known about the risks of congenital defects as a result of incestuous relationships.

He said the man’s son was fine physically, but only time would tell if he suffered psychological damage as a result of knowing that his father was also his grandfather.

The doctor told a psychiatrist that he could not understand how the relationship developed.

“It was so overwhelming. The feelings were so strong,” he said. “I didn’t have any clear idea why. Incest is abhorrent to me and (my daughter).”

The pair began a sexual relationship within 72 hours of meeting for the first time when the doctor had gone to Britain to meet her.

The woman soon moved to Melbourne and they lived together.

The woman has since left Australia, but she made a statutory declaration attempting to put the bizarre nature of the relationship into context, the judge said.

The incest was uncovered during Family Court proceedings involving access for another of the doctor’s children.

The doctor, now in his 60s, pleaded guilty to one count of incest. The judge said the doctor had no prior convictions.

He said the doctor was a hard-working and conscientious medical practitioner who saw more than 150 patients a week.

But he said the doctor’s crime had nothing to do with his work.

“There is no evidence before me that my sentence today will affect your right to practise . . .” the judge said.

He said the unique circumstances of the case had to be taken into account, including that the pair met as adults, were consenting participants, and they did not have a background as father and daughter.

Medical Practitioners Board spokeswoman Nicole Newton said the board would immediately refer the matter to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal for a hearing.

John Patrick O’Kane Perth WA Murders baby son

January 2009 and John O’Kane was arrested for the murder of his 4 month old baby son Zach. He murdered the baby and then left his tiny little body in his car for 3 days before burying him in a shallow grave at Collie WA.

The 40 year old truck driver is currently on remand.

http://www.news.com.au/perthnow/story/0,21598,24894535-948,00.html

Their Silent Cries…

Above is a picture of a child ghost in the movie The Grudge.  The Movie was made by a director that wanted to portray the rage from women over the years from crimes against women especially domestic violence.  In the movie, the mother had a crush on her teacher and records it in her journal.  Her husband discovers her secret crush and breaks her neck in a fit of rage.  As she is dieing, her voice box is damaged as she lays on the floor watching her husband drown her son.  She cannot scream or cry in pain.  The only sound that leaves her mouth is a chilling croak.   

In real life, these victims don’t come back to make others feel the pain that they endured and it is often why they become our forgotten voices in a landscape of systematic failure.  Perhaps we will look back to this point of history and wonder why indeed these children were forgotten and why something was not done sooner.  Whilst Anonymums focus is on mothers and children’s rights, we have not forgotten fathers either.  We are against groups that encourage violence and child abuse and use excuses such as contact to justify their means to incite terror and silence those who speak out against it.  Unfortunately fathers are represented by undesirables who wish to destroy  all barriers to maintaining abusive control over children and mothers.  Research on homicides has already revealed that some of these fathers and mothers will harm or even kill children to punish their exes.  Homicide stats state that most of these are fathers and whilst fathers Rights groups would prefer to distort these facts and portray that mothers are the major offenders, it simply is not true especially in the dynamics of family violence.  
What we cannot deny is the consequences of history where we have thousands of years and establishment of a world dominated by men.  In the last hundred years, women have begun to have rights in nearly every area and become recognized as equals to men in both home and public life.  Along with women’s rights came children’s rights that were established by women who knew all to well the dehumanizing status as “property” and seeked to change that area as well.  In the late 70s domestic violence began to peak and later became recognized as a deadly backlash against women and children’s rights.   Mens movements began to form as the ones we know today persuading the public that we have too much equality that men are now victims of the woman’s movements.  Statistics prove that this is simply not true and their advocacy is disastrous when a majority of their members claim to have been falsely accused of child abuse and domestic violence.  Few horrors that have hit the public have not been untainted by the mens movements attempts to conquer public conversation on violence prevention with the old “fatherless” “false allegations” “It was her fault” “Parent Alienation”.  Their arguments have often halted and diverted most public enquiries into victims of child abuse and domestic violence.  Last year, a father abandoned his three year old at a city railway station after murdering her mother.  Her name was dubbed, “Pumpkin” as the story became a world wide issue and a grave reason why more needs to be done on protecting victims throughout the Family Court processes.  Around the same time, Karen Bell lost her three children because she had to go to family court before she could even protect them.  Ingrid Poulson lost her children for the same reasons.   Dionne Dalton warned the family court that the children were in grave danger, but the Family Court handed the children over to the father.  In the next court case, he applied for shared parenting but accused her of being a negligent mother.  The court awarded the father unsupervised weekend access and the next day he killed the children and then himself.  The men blamed the death on not having shared parenting laws and ignored the risks involved.  The freeman’s had also raised concerns for two years and just recently lost their only daughter after the father was awarded shared care.  The incident was on Melbourne’s west Gate Bridge in front of many motorists and became a worldwide tragedy.  The Family Courts response was less than humane as they attempted to divert responsibility by stating that they were not aware and that the courts documents were “stolen” from the chief justices car.  
Whilst this was going on, a mother named Melinda Thompson is one of 126 mothers on the run from the family courts being hunted down like an animal because she fears for the safety of her children.  How many children does it take before we have some serious changes?
Add your voice to our petition at:
http://www.gopetition.com.au/online/22705.html